Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you for being here.
In the cuts, there are significant departments, like tourism, that get whacked pretty hard. There is $95 million in tourism-related cuts in total in this proposal. What would have been the percentages if you did a broad-range cut? I'm not saying that would have been the best way to go, but what would that have been as a percentage of the cuts, and why did tourism receive such a hard cut?