I think it's about expectations. When the industry was faced with the possibility of electricity deregulation, the question was why we would want to do that. If you couldn't tell people that it was because the price was going to come down, it didn't fly. We had relatively low prices, so why would we experiment in Canada? Well, where we did experiment was where prices were high, with mixed results.
I think it's the same thing. What we're asking for is a world in which prices will be lower than they would otherwise be if we did not have coherence, if we did not have timely investment, but that's hard to prove. It's not whether prices will come down for the industrial sector if you do all the right things, not necessarily. We've already tried to explain that the underlying fundamentals show a rising cost curve for energy across the board. The question is, can we make it lower than it would otherwise be if we do it badly? I feel very confident in saying that's the case, but it's a tough case to prove to skeptical people, let's face it.