The subject of our briefing today is the Canada-Korea FTA negotiations, so I didn't come prepared to address the issue of safeguard actions and how the government deals with safeguard actions involving imports from China. But as I understand the process, it would essentially be up to the applicants who are seeking the measures to make a case for whether or not the safeguard measures should be imposed, as they did to the CITT.
The CITT looks at the question of injury uniquely, and then the government has to make a decision on what the overall interests of the country will be in terms of whether or not to accept the recommendation from the CITT.
I think you mentioned a case involving bicycles. My recollection is that the decision of the government was that it would not be in the overall interest of the economy of the country to accept the recommendation. But it's a bifurcated process. The CITT looks only at the narrow question of whether the domestic manufacturer has been injured or is at risk of being injured by imports. Then it falls to the government to make the overall judgment as to whether or not imposing remedial measures would be beneficial to the Canadian economy.