We're continuing to evaluate the concerns they've raised. One of the questions we are interested in discussing with them is whether the separate class election provisions, which we talked about earlier, are of assistance to them, and, if not, why they wouldn't help. Our analysis suggests that a separate class election can cover a large part of the gap that would result if our CCA rates are too low for a particular piece of equipment.
An additional consideration is that right now our system is fairly simple with respect to manufacturing and processing equipment. We provide a 30% rate to this very large category of assets, and that rate is set so as to ensure that it's sufficient to reflect at least the average experience of assets in that class. It would be an interesting question as to whether to start pulling out particular sectors or subsectors if the analysis showed there may be a useful argument for them.