The clerk passed me a note to remind me to be helpful as to what the process is, and perhaps I should just explain this.
If the motion passes, which I assume it very well might, then I, as the chair, would report this to the House. Then a member could put a notice of a motion of concurrence to report in the House--48 hours' notice, two sleeps--and then a member would move concurrence at routine proceedings and a debate begins and there's a three-hour debate.
I think what Mr. Carrie is asking very directly--and you can say yes, you can say no, you can say “I'm not going to answer that question”, it's your right--he's asking very directly of everyone on this side if any one of the opposition parties is going to put it on the notice paper and stand up and move a three-hour debate. So it's a very direct question; it's a very plain question. It's a question that government asks.
I don't want to speak for Mr. Carrie, but if he gets a commitment that no other party will do that, and it's not to have a three-hour debate in the House, but have further study at committee, my sense is that he and his members would be a lot more open to this motion. It's a very generic question. You could answer yes or no or “I don't want to answer it”, but that's the question.