This is in fact a tax deferral. In a sense the argument for having a more aggressive CCA is that you get more investment, more companies up and running, and then the government in the long term can actually recoup more revenue from the greater economic activity, but the amount you're recommending--the $35 million, $71 million, $71 million--is the exact same amount; it's just written off by 2010 instead of 2016.
On October 31st, 2006. See this statement in context.