It's a bit of an untested proposition, frankly. I think the general view would be, first of all, that programs that are more generally available and those focused on something like cogeneration clearly have a lot of different forms of public benefit associated with them.
What we as an industry, for a very long time, have taken a view against are capital or production subsidies to the industry, because, first of all, we oppose them when they occur in other countries, and secondly, they do change the basis for competition. Projects targeted at environmental enhancement, which obviously could have some competitive benefit as well, I think, would be favourably looked at. But that's kind of the distinction we would draw.
But as I say, we haven't really had to face that in a broad way just yet.