What type of analysis have you done, though, on those types of workers who actually fill the gap that you're talking about in terms of the needs out there in the private sector? Privatizing liquor stores and having the cashiers and stock people.... That's not going to significantly affect what you're proposing, I don't believe. Have you done that analysis?
You're also talking about policy branches, but that's what we heard from the representative of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, who said that they were losing these people, and they couldn't communicate any more to get access to government programs. If you take those policy people out, what do we do then in terms of trying to access government programs that are supposed to be helping business, like Picarn and a series of other operations?