I don't think anybody really does. It's strategic in terms of where I think we ought to go to support, because other countries are doing that.
Maybe I can ask Mr. McLean a question. Boy, I wish your pressure balancing valve had been available when I was in residence in university; it would have saved a lot of grief, not only for me but for other people.
You talked about infrastructure. One thing that's happening in the Windsor-Detroit corridor.... As well, the Province of Ontario has made a request today for gateway funds based upon what's happening out in the Vancouver region. We're talking about public-private partnerships. What worries me is that, say, if on a 400-series highway or the Windsor-Detroit border we introduce toll roads or additional costs for all our traffic that goes through this region, that'll be different from, for example, Fort Erie and Buffalo, Niagara Falls, Sarnia, where the costs are much cheaper because they're publicly owned and operated.... The Ambassador Bridge has been making a significant profit in my region for a long time, with the investment now going back into the region. It's about 17% to 20% higher per average car, and we don't even really know the figures for transport trucks.
With that, when you talk about an infrastructure, is it something you want to be the lowest cost for the actual service delivery for all of our goods and services? You mentioned rail as well. Is it worthwhile investing in this infrastructure to lower the cost of shipping goods and services to the United States, given how many border problems there are?