Mr. Hicks, on that point, a BlackBerry or the shaver you used this morning, Fusion, the new one that has come out from Gillette, the plastic may be made in China for pennies. It may be exported with all these little subsidies, but the actual technology that went into creating five microblades was actually made in Quebec. That product itself has high value-added.
There is an argument out there suggesting that where we can continue to be competitive, where we can continue to maintain our standard of living, where we can continue a viable manufacturing sector, is not just in niche marketing, but in recognizing that in areas where we do specialize, these are not technologies that China or South Korea or anyone has. We are concerned about copyright, but the argument may come back to me in some corners—not necessarily in my constituency, but across the country—that if we meet a challenge of subsidies and we meet the kinds of incentives that are being given in China, many of them probably bordering on dumping, we should do the same. Are we protecting industries that cannot make the transition in an important time and, as a result, unwittingly not preparing ourselves for the next economy? I realize it's a structural problem. I'm not playing devil's advocate, but it's an important argument that's out there.