Mr. Chair, with great regret, I would challenge the chair on this. If you look at the substance of what has been put forward, this is not a normal motion. This is in fact an argument. It's an argument that gives rise to a debate and that has had the consequences of one particular member in effect filibustering.
My concern, substantively, is that I think in the ruling you gave--if you look at your initial comments--as to whether you could receive it as a motion within the context--