Mr. Crête, with due respect, a point of order was raised by Mr. McTeague, that the motion was out of order. I responded by saying that I ruled the motion in order and I ruled the amendment in order. The only way for that ruling to be changed was for the chair to be challenged. Mr. McTeague subsequently challenged the ruling of the chair. He has done so according to, procedurally, every correct means. He has the authority to challenge the ruling of the chair and he has done so, so we're moving to a vote on that. We are proceeding in a manner that is procedurally correct, according to the best advice that I'm given. We're moving to the challenge of the ruling of the chair.
