Subject to Mr. Carrie's intervention—I would certainly leave my comments until then—we would certainly be amenable to supporting that motion. I think it became very clear, Chair, that we were in fact going to take the time, by resolution of this committee, to look at this issue. That would not have affected the minister's original timetable, but in his haste, he rushed ahead on December 16. So we would support this motion.
I'd like to hear if Mr. Carrie has any other interventions prior to laying out the case, which I believe it has to be stated. That case is very contrary to the December 16 declarations of the minister to the effect that this is somehow respectful of the TPR recommendations, that it is good for consumers, and that it is very much toward benefiting an open market. We disagree on all those fronts, but I'd certainly be willing to hear Mr. Carrie and then return right after that, Mr. Chair.