Well, it's certainly one of the reasons we believed it would be good to have a greater deterrence through the potential implication of AMPs on anti-competitive behaviour. We believe the tools we have are quite appropriate for abuse of dominance, because you have to remember this type of behaviour is often very pro-competitive.
The types of complaints we get that are related to abuse of dominance often relate to aggressive pricing in the marketplace. For example, allegations of predatory pricing would be something that we'd handle under the provisions of abuse of dominance. Predatory pricing can also just be extremely aggressive low pricing.
It's why I was saying to Mr. Crête that when we look at the marketplace to try to get a handle on the competitive dynamic, we often look at the cost structures of companies. To the extent you have a more efficient entrant in the marketplace or at least an entrant that has similar types of cost structures, you will anticipate that prices will be driven down through the competitive process. We believe it's a good thing for consumers.