I was here on Monday and I think, frankly, there was some confusion over when people were talking about the policy direction as opposed to when they were talking about the proposed order of forbearance. When I heard the questions of legality, I heard him speaking about the policy direction and whether or not it was legal. I certainly wouldn't expect the vice-chair, as you said, to opine on the legality of a proposed order of forbearance. That's not what I heard him doing.
Certainly, from our perspective, we would be a party affected by this order. I would expect Bell Canada to seek forbearance in the business market in the city of Toronto if this order went ahead as drafted. If it did, we would certainly question how that would pertain to granting forbearance to the business market in a place like Toronto, Ottawa, or anywhere else where we were in business, as to whether or not this order is ultra vires of the existing Telecommunications Act and doesn't require a statutory amendment to grant forbearance without any consideration of the market power of the party applying to the actual presence of competition.