No, clearly, some have more than others, and that's because of what economists I think would refer to as some of the economies of scale and scope and density that exist in the industry. Clearly, a larger player will have more of an advantage. It's just like the McLaughlin Motor Car Company found it hard to compete with General Motors and finally we ended up with a smaller number of car companies.
We don't think it's the role of government policy to simply protect smaller businesses because they find it harder to compete with the bigger ones. It should be the role of government policy, we think, to encourage a framework of competition so that the consumer benefits the most, not the particular competitors.