Our recommendations—and they weren't even recommendations, but our thoughts about it—were set out in the afterword. We did not make specific recommendations for removal. But we said essentially what I said earlier, that the reasons for maintaining foreign ownership restrictions in the carriage area really are not nearly as strong as they are in the content area.
We have many types of industries, from the pharmaceutical industry to the automobile industry, where we have Canadian regulations that apply regardless of nationality. In principle, there's no reason why you couldn't have mandatory carriage rules that applied as much to a cable television company, to use an example, whether it was Canadian-owned or foreign-owned.
It probably doesn't come as a surprise to you, but the Canadian telecom and cable companies are also large, profit-seeking companies, and they don't necessarily conduct their business solely in the public interest. It's the role of government, as you said, to set the appropriate rules or regulatory framework for those companies to operate within. Whether they're Canadian-owned or foreign-owned, in the carriage industry I'm not sure it would make a lot of difference.