Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Earlier, Mr. Intven, you had mentioned that in fact there was a fair degree of competition in rural and small-town communities, and I want to pursue that a little bit with you.
Any competition that does exist in some of the more prosperous smaller towns was abetted and assisted by the win-back restrictions. It was assisted by the previous market-based test, which allowed a triggering at 25% as opposed to a mere presence test.
Aren't you concerned that with those changes we will not see those communities that are currently not as well served by vigorous competition in fact hindered from ever developing that level of competition? If a mere presence test will trigger deregulation, any smaller competitor entering one of these smaller markets and establishing marketing and an office will trigger that, and at that moment be subject to deregulated competition. Probably the example that would be set by a couple of these cases would discourage competition in similar-sized markets elsewhere. Are you concerned about that?