You mentioned the Competition Bureau. One of the failures, you said, of the New Zealand example was the lack of an organization or a regulatory oversight organization with the expertise at the time. The Competition Bureau, we've heard from other witnesses, does not have the established expertise that the CRTC does have currently. The Competition Bureau is also notoriously slow in its response to these issues. For a smaller competitor, a lengthy battle with a larger telco could be devastating in terms of the profits of a new competitor.
It didn't work in New Zealand, as you stated, in fact partially because of the lack of expertise in the regulatory body. So why are you so confident in the Competition Bureau when it has the same challenge ahead of it? You refer to the telecom competition tribunal, but it really hasn't been established.