Thank you very much for clarifying that.
The second question I want to raise with you is that there seems to be a lot of discussion over the government's market presence test, about which there are two broadly held views. One is that for issues such as forbearance, the CRTC and the government ought to rely on a certain percentage, i.e., 25% market share, in order to allow new entrants to gain some access to that market. The second view, which I think was eloquently stated by the Commissioner of the Competition Bureau, is that you ought to look at the competing services available, rather than a specific percentage.
You indicated that you might not exactly endorse the government's market presence test. One of the concerns raised by some of the witnesses was that the Competition Tribunal and the Competition Commissioner do not act as quickly as the CRTC, so they prefer the CRTC.
But if in fact you adopted what I believe is chapter 4 of your report, where you adopt the telecommunications competition tribunal, this would in fact work very well with the new market test itemized by the minister, and certainly supported by the Competition Commissioner. So if you were to move to that type of a tribunal or panel, that would address the concern about a timely response by the CRTC new competition panel.