I'll move on to the CRTC, which had a decision with regard to the overpayment and charging it to customers. Bell, Telus in particular, had serious overcharges, and the CRTC ruled that those funds would then go into a development fund, perhaps, to do Internet service in rural areas. That's being contested in courts by consumers who are suggesting those funds should be returned to them.
Say a model comes out where that money actually then goes back to the incumbents to be able to use that towards rural development. It's been an extra surcharge on their customers in a series of places. Will that put you at a competitive disadvantage with regard to their now having this equity that came from overcharges in services to put back into their own development of rural service to the outside?