I want to thank both of you for being here.
Mr. Geist, I take your last comment with respect to spam. I had a bill that didn't quite make it as far as I wanted it to, but that's probably because there are just so many good issues out there, and this one, as a whole, is one that intrigues.
Mr. Church, I have had a little bit of experience with the Competition Act. I've had a little bit of experience as well with the CRTC, in an earlier period, but I've also noted in your comments that nowhere have you made reference to the TRP report. You talked about the limitations of the CRTC in its existing way of looking at these new emerging technologies. If I heard you correctly, you said it is possible to have two competitors at the end of the day.
In that kind of scenario, sir, when we're trying to increase competition, why would you take the position that simply having two competitors is good enough? The scenario that we've seen, and we've seen this in other industries, is that often, depending on rationalization and efficiencies or if something should happen down the road, it is conceivable that one of the two may in fact quit. We also know that when it comes to wireless, which is the third option, Canadians aren't very well served by that right now.
With your experience, in your estimation, why didn't the government proceed first with the issue of wireless before proceeding headlong into ignoring the TRP report or choosing selectively only parts of it? Why has this not factored into your comments here in this presentation before this committee today?