No, I don't. The deregulation, by the test proposed, occurs when there are competing service providers in the area already. Re-monopolization would require the incumbent to drive the competitors out of the marketplace. These cable companies are big boys, not little mom and pop shops. The wireless players are big players. I think the idea that they would be driven from the marketplace is just not credible, and even if, hypothetically, any particular business found itself in financial difficulties, the infrastructure is already there: the cable is in the ground, the wireless towers are in place. So if—again hypothetically, in a sky-is-falling scenario—some competitor company has business problems, someone else is able to step in and pick up the infrastructure and keep going right from there.
So I think the idea that re-monopolization is going to occur is simply not credible.