The problem with the 25% test is that it's based on the wrong market definition. It's based on these very large, 86 local forbearance regions. The problem with it is you can have competition start to happen in one area.
For instance, in Alberta right now, Telus has a problem in Fort McMurray. They face very severe competition from Shaw, but Fort McMurray is in a very large local forbearance region, and before they can hit the 25%, they're going to lose a substantial amount of the market share in Fort McMurray. So the problem with those regions, the way they've been defined by the CRTC, is that they don't reflect where competition actually comes from. Therefore, it makes it far too slow to have forbearance. It takes too long, because you have to lose very high market shares in a region in which there is competition before you can reach the 25% for the whole region. The market definition used by the CRTC is wrong.