The important thing about what the CRTC did, and about what is in the minister's order, is that we still have this latent regulation. We still have a price ceiling on basic residential service. So I think that's really important, because it means if you've made a mistake on geographic market definition and there's some area where you've forborne and there's no competition, they still have, in essence, regulation.
If you think about the incentives for anti-competitive behaviour, which certain people are very concerned about, well, there's no point, right? There's no point driving people out of business if I can't raise my price. Why can't I raise my price? I could have entry from Vonage. I could have someone else acquire the cable company's facilities, or, ultimately, I still am regulated there. There's no way to recoup the investment in predation. That's an important consideration. We have this kind of lingering remanent on upward pricing by the incumbents.
The debate is about the ability to lower prices, and that's a debate in which consumers hope that lower prices win.