There are two responses to that. One is on this victim thing that you keep talking about. I disagree with that.
It doesn't get rid of the assets, so there's no sense in the ILEC making the investment in predation if it doesn't actually drive the assets out of the business. It may drive mom and pop A out, but then mom and pop B can acquire the assets for a dollar and still compete. So I don't necessarily agree with the victim thing.
The second thing that I suspect is happening now and will happen more is that the mom and pop cable guy is going to sell out to Shaw and Rogers, and they will make the investments in the millions of dollars that are required because they are going to have huge economies of scale and scope already; they have the experience and they have already a bunch of assets that they'll be able to use in multiple geographic markets to support it. So they'll be able to do it cheaper than the mom and pop will be able to do it.