If I understand correctly, Mr. Chairman, you are the one who ruled on the admissibility of requests. For my part, if you consider that we are discussing the original motion and that there is an amendment from a member with the other wording, we will debate it accordingly, but that is important for what follows. As you said earlier, if this practice develops, anybody here could give notice and show up with something different when the time comes to debate the motion. In that regard, the clerk has provided us with information that is more or less...
Nowhere in the routine motions have I seen anything about alternate motions, unless I am losing my memory. Perhaps I forgot, but I would like the situation to be clarified on the basis of the principle and for us to subsequently agree on the relevance of accepting it or not.
If you accept the motion and the amendment, I will follow the chair's decision of course. However, at first sight, it seems quite odd to accept to consider this motion as an alternate motion for the other.