I am coming back to this, because the chairman himself raised the issue regarding the difference between the two motions. I will read the wording of the substantive motion:That forty-eight (48) hours' notice be required for any substantive motion to be considered by the Committee, unless the substantive motion relates directly to business then under consideration; and that the notice of motion be filed with the Clerk of the Committee and distributed to members in both official languages [...]
The motion we received in accordance with that talks about holding public hearings, making recommendations to the House, and reporting to the House. In parallel, we have another motion that simply asks the Minister of Industry to wait for the decision. In my opinion, the two motions are very different on the substance of the matter. In light of the precedent that may create, I think that we could wait until Thursday. If it is the right version, the other will be withdrawn. If this one becomes the member's motion, we will examine it then, at the right time. It seems very clear to me that this is not the same motion and that it must not be considered as a motion in accordance with our regular procedures.