I'm just going to respond, because I do have the second motion in front of me, and I would say as the chair that the motions are substantively different. In my view, it doesn't even seem to be an amendment. It seems to be a substantively different motion. If we allow motions by substitution, then the 48-hour rule is not in effect, because Mr. Crête could introduce a motion and appear at the committee and say, “Well, I'm withdrawing this motion and substituting this motion.”
Mr. McTeague.