Yes, I think Michael Janigan at the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, who has testified here, would be more appropriate to answer that question, because he's done so much work in the area.
But I think it always comes back to what the alternatives are for the customers. If you get a deal--let's say Shaw provides you with this deal this month--then if there is no competition, once the competition is removed the deal is removed. Your deal lasts only for as long as that particular two- or three-year time period. And what has happened to the state of competition while you've been protected from prices? That kind of competition you're certainly not going to see in the rural areas.