My question is probably for Ms. MacDonald or Ms. Léger.
If the government, in your view, or in my view, is determined not to use what we referred to in the original decision as a bright-light market share test, which was alluded to a little earlier, in my view, it should be using the Competition Bureau's test in terms of the kinds of criteria that are linked to the finding under subsection 34(2). I won't get into that.
Do you believe that we should be moving toward the kinds of criteria that would support a conclusion that sufficient competition should exist before deregulation? That's a very pointed question. If we're not going to use what the CRTC has proposed, what the TPR has proposed, then we should at least fall back, in the absence of a Bill C-41, which has been proposed by the government, on the particular criteria that require, above all other matters, that sufficient competition exist under subsection 34(2). Do you believe that we should be following that, or that the government ought to be following that, as a minimum test?