I understand some of those things, but here's a good example. This Perspectives magazine is the African journal on HIV/AIDS. It's a pretty sophisticated African publication on the whole issue and how they're dealing with the situation. So it's not whether we're dealing with individuals and organizations that don't understand how these things move.
What is wrong? Is it on this side here, or is it over there? I mean, we've had this argument before, when we actually went through this bill. There were a lot of different individuals who liked to paint that the problem was actually on the other side. I think it's on our side here.
So what I want to know is does this legislation need amendments to make it work? Does it need amendments like in other countries, where they're removing some of the pre-approved lists--lists that we created that we didn't have to? Does it need amendments like waiving the duration of time, for example, for two years, so it can go for a longer period of time? People who are taking medications for HIV and AIDS need it for more than two years.
If we do those things, will it actually work? Will Canada become a player in the field? We're not a player. Other people are. I want to know why.