I think I've answered this question a few times.
I'm not going to deny that absolutely some of our funding is “tied”, for lack of a better word, to Canadian products; in this particular sector, we don't do a whole lot of it, and we haven't considered it under CAMR. As I said, we'd be willing to consider it and to look at it from all of the perspectives, including the one Mr. Clark mentioned.
On the specific issue of the global fund, the understanding is that when we provide funding to those types of mechanisms, we're not in a position to be able to tie our funding--in this case, to the global fund--even if we wanted to.