Madame Brunelle, that's a very good point, and it's a point with which I would not take issue. I think what you're essentially saying is that we have what we call the millennium development goals. Each and every one of them should be attended to; each and every one of them places a moral imperative on the western world to supply resources, reduce debt, and set up international fair trade rules.
One of those millennium development goals is to turn back the communicable diseases of AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, and one of those goals is to reduce poverty and hunger, and the others are maternal mortality reduction and infant mortality reduction. Yes, if CIDA were able to target funds to the other imperatives, along with the crucial imperative of dealing with the pandemic—The pandemic is destroying development in so many countries that you can't even make progress on the other goals, because there is such a level of disease and death; you have to secure the health first, before you can secure the development. That point has been made quite eloquently by the economist Jeffrey Sachs. He calls it the disease burden and says that unless you deal with the burden of disease, you can't deal with the other phenomena.