Can I add two points very briefly?
In terms of deterrents, there is civil deterrence. Increase the penalties. In terms of criminal deterrents, criminalize the process or criminalize the act. One point about camcorders is that if somebody is in a movie cinema and camcords, there may be a copyright law that's against it, but until you can get that guy's name, you can't institute an action against him. But if you criminalize that action of camcording, you can get a policeman to arrest that person and you can get an identification, which you cannot get civilly. Even under an Anton Piller order, somebody can refuse to identify himself.
Finally, in terms of effectiveness, when you do get a remedy and there's a shell company, as Monsieur Geist has mentioned, that's also part of increasing penalties. It's not only increasing the amount of penalties; it's increasing who pays the penalties, the personal liability of directors and officers of companies, and piercing the corporate veil in instances of counterfeiting.
Thank you very much.