I understand that, Mr. Minister, but my question asked why you chose two years as opposed to five years. Is it a cost factor? Is it an ideological factor? I'm asking the reason for bringing it to two years from five years, and what analysis was done in terms of the impact on the industry? It's as simple as that.
I understand the value of it. We all debated that. I'm asking why you chose a different path to what we recommended.