In the Trade-marks Act there is currently trademark protection, but trademarks are always challengeable. My colleague here from the Intellectual Property Office is in a better position to respond, but briefly, they are always challengeable. So are the official marks challengeable on the basis of whether an organization or entity is a public authority or not.
What we wanted to do in this piece of legislation is to ensure that for a finite list of marks that are included in schedule 1 and 2 there is an unequivocal understanding that those marks are non-challengeable. But they are finite. It is not a long list. It is what other countries have done in the past and has already been done for the 2012 games. It goes beyond, but it is also necessary in order to meet the commitment so that sponsors are secure in their investment.
As for ambush marketing, there is no ambush marketing provision in the Trade-marks Act, so this is new. There is a passing off in the Trade-marks Act, but this is new. This is deemed as being a much more serious and growing problem in the Olympic Games.