You're referring to schedule 3 of the bill. I think it's worth taking a few minutes to explain what schedule 3 is about.
The prohibition in the bill refers to schedule 1 and schedule 2. The marks for which a use and adoption are prohibited are the words that are found in schedule 1 and schedule 2.
Schedule 1, if this bill passes, would have permanent protection. Those are the words that a lot of our international partners have protected around the world, those fortunate enough to have hosted the Olympics and Paralympics. Those are more generic words relating to the IOC, so the Olympic movement.
Schedule 2 has temporary application. The protection of those words and symbols will expire at the end of 2010. Those are words that are linked to the Vancouver games more specifically.
So schedules 1 and 2 list the types of protections.
Schedule 3 is intended to be an indicator, a help for a court. It is not a prohibition. You will not be prohibited from using them, but if the judge or court is faced with a case of ambush marketing—i.e., an unfair association by a business or a company with the games—the court can look at schedule 3 and take those terms into account in determining whether or not ambush marketing has occurred. That is all. It is simply an indication and a help, a guidance for the court to determine whether or not ambush marketing has occurred.