I think what we'd find in that situation is that any sponsors involved in those provincial games would be under the prohibitions of the statute.
Subclause 3(1) prohibits the use of a number of specifically Olympic terms. So as long as the provincial games didn't use those Olympic terms, that would be okay.
Similarly, schedule 2 refers to a number of terms that are specific to the Vancouver Olympics.
The risk is that the words in schedule 3 and the way in which they would be interpreted leave some doubt amongst sponsors as to what activities would run afoul of the legislation. We think it would be preferable that the court be given more unlimited discretion in dealing with activities that are at the heart of what this legislation is. And what's at the heart of this legislation is preventing activities that improperly suggest an affiliation with the Olympics.