In interpreting any particular incident, a court generally looks at the language of the statute. The language of guidelines is not binding on a court. The guidelines may impact the way in which the organization itself deals with the legislation, but it's not binding on a court. Therefore, the concern is that if there are other issues that VANOC or any other organization that is going to be protected by this bill wants to have considered by the court, they should be in the bill and they shouldn't be part of voluntary guidelines.
Another concern we have is that from the way the bill has been drafted, it is clear that other words can be added to the statute by regulatory amendment. For example, other words can be added to the schedules, so there is a potential that far more than we now see could be prohibited by the statute once the regulations are complete, or in the years leading up to 2010.