At the beginning I wanted to preface my comments by saying that I practised as a trademark lawyer for 27 years, and during that time there have been more than a few Olympic Games, and one or two in Canada as well. I think we have some experience already about how the protection of the Olympic marks has been done so far. With that background there is already a body of law, there is case law, there is precedent, that permits parties to know what's going on.
In addition, the official marks that have already been protected are published. They're on the trademarks office database, and they're easy for people to look at. This legislation creates whole new rules, and whenever you have new legislation, you have some unpredictability and uncertainty about how that legislation is going to be impacted. We think that if you want to bring in this legislation to deal with the threat of ambush marketing, let's do it. Let's let it work until 2010, and let's see what happens. At the end of 2010 we may find that it has done nothing to amplify the protection that already exists in the Trade-marks Act. We may find it is totally unsatisfactory. Therefore, we believe that we should stop and take a breath after the Olympics, review the situation, and see at that time what's the best way to protect everybody who's involved.