You made a number of recommendations here, amendments to some existing language, particularly I believe in clause 6, that the words “approved, authorized, or endorsed” be used as evidence of irreparable harm. If such an undertaking were to be considered by the committee, how do you believe this would address the immediacy of the impact of ambush marketing?
We're dealing with the question of a period of time for the Olympics and the Paralympics, over a very defined period. Would this be sufficient to deter or arrest the problem?