I'm not belabouring this. What I'm trying to say is that if somebody isn't very clear about what this means and they have to go to court, I think it's not what any of us want to see. Nor do I think the Olympic Games wants to be marred with taking some poor little artist.... Artists are not always wealthy enough to be able to go to court to defend themselves for producing 100 prints of their work.
Is there something you could do in the regulations that would clarify it for people who do not have the money to go to court to deal with this after the fact? People won't do anything if they're afraid they're going to be breaking rules. They may just do nothing; you would stifle any kind of creativity.
I understand what you're saying. I agree with it. But I really think you don't want to hear later on that the Vancouver Olympic committee went after some poor struggling artist who made 100 prints and didn't believe that was going to cause him trouble, or who didn't want to do anything because they were afraid they'd be in violation.
I think that clarification is what most of us are trying to get at. It's not that we disagree with the legislation. We just want to make sure that at the end of the day it doesn't get a black eye by saying you beat up on some little guy. That's all.
Can it be in the regulations?