Instead of making me feel better, that's now raised a question for me. If we are already saying in the bill that anything that looks like or is similar to one of these trademarks or any of the things in that section that you just held up.... I know you say that this is specific, but an inukshuk is an inukshuk is an inukshuk. And if an inukshuk looks like that--it doesn't have to be exactly like that--are you now telling me that it doesn't come under the understanding of the March 2, 2007 deadline?
On June 5th, 2007. See this statement in context.