I have just one follow-up question, Mr. Masse.
You can address this as a panel. My understanding in reading this legislation is that if an aboriginal group uses it, or if a not-for-profit group uses one of the trademarks, and it's not for commercial purposes, it's not covered by the legislation. That's why I'm not sure why this is necessary. Because if a not-for-profit group uses it, it's not covered by this legislation.