I don't know if Eve is speaking on behalf of the apparel industry or on behalf of her own personal views. Maybe Bob could add to that, because in my discussions with apparel manufacturers they have said that they would very much welcome the idea of outward processing.
We have people like Main Knitting operating in downtown Montreal with 2,500 employees. He's moving a lot of his production to India. Whether they have outward processing or not, he would very much welcome the opportunity of knitting, dyeing, and making his fabric here, and rather than having to import the total product, being able to import a Canadian product. There are other people I think who would be quite interested. So I'm not sure that there is that conflict about outward processing for all apparel manufacturers.
The other issue, of course, is that the major apparel manufacturers have already done it. Whether you look at Silver, or any of these other major players who get a lot of press, they are making all their products offshore, and they have a vested interest, in many cases, in bringing in the goods from Bangladesh because they've been able to take advantage of that low labour cost and no duties to be able to grow their market. I think some of these people would welcome the opportunity, if they were able, to have available fabric, to be able to design and develop their fabrics here, and to utilize that fabric by sending it offshore and having it produced, and marry it with the current production they have offshore as well, so that there would be some kind of balance.
So I don't think there is a total disagreement on outward processing, and I think on many of the other issues, like LDCs, we are in agreement. We are in agreement about market access. I think we're more in agreement than we've ever been before. I don't know if Bob would back that up, but maybe Liz would want to answer.