The time shifting is something that needs to be addressed, and there's some cloud that's been put on that from a U.S. decision and debates in Canada about what we should do. Time shifting is value added for the customer. It's a good thing. It's even a good thing socially. I have to admit that the fact that I can watch things at a different time or I can record something, a show, the news in Winnipeg and in Vancouver, as opposed to the news in Ottawa, gets me to understand what is going on in those cities the way that I wouldn't.
But it's really that consumers expect to be able to make use of that capability. They don't expect to have to pay extra for it. The technology allows for it, so you wouldn't want the law to interfere here and block it.
The other thing with the PVR, the TiVos, whatever, is everybody accepts that I can record a Formula One race and watch it at a time that suits me better than seven in the morning, whatever. We all accept that you can do that in your home. The technology exists to do the exact same thing in a network. That can prove to be more convenient to the user, and it doesn't affect the basic rights or the flow of funds that would have come from the original show anyway. Yet our laws at the moment are saying that it might not be allowable.
So those are the kinds of things that perhaps in the future we need to address.