Obviously we have the carriers, the ISPs--just about everybody involved in lawful access--within our membership, so we've been following that file very closely.
I will just mention on the centres of excellence, though, that I'm certainly aware of projects that are going to be great if they go ahead. They will start a lot of small enterprises and so on, but I agree with you that it all happened very fast and it had to be done, so there are a lot of great things that will not get to the finish line.
On lawful access, the view of our industry is a balanced one. To the extent that you can do a lot of law enforcement with the old technology, we say there is certainly no reason not to do law enforcement with the new technology, so by all means let's have lawful access legislation that applies to the new technology.
The important element there is that there is no problem today. Collaboration on an ad hoc basis between the authorities and the industry is working very well. The purpose of legislation would be to develop more standards-based approaches, and to make sure everybody is obligated and not simply proceeding on the collaborative basis that takes place today.
It's a burden on our industry, a burden that our industry is prepared to take on, provided it applies to generally commercially available or standards-based equipment that the manufacturers will have and also provided that they continue to get reimbursed for the considerable efforts they make on a seven-day, 24-hour basis to the public authorities. There is actually an opportunity for legislation to clarify a couple of exceptional cases in which there is some friction going on and to resolve that problem.