I'm going to pick up where Mr. Albrecht took us with respect to S and T. I was very happy to hear some of your remarks.
I'm wondering if any of you here share the view that $167 million funding for the centres for excellence and commercialization research is sufficient; If indeed there is a requirement, above all, that there be substantial private sector funding needed; if in fact it only provides for the same old, who've been in the past, benefactors of this particular strategy, and the eligibility criteria and procedural rules having changed, if you see that as a positive step forward in terms of a strategy on S and T.
I'm of course not trying to be partisan here. I don't want to create that impression. I am, however, interested in your take on the adequacy of the centres of excellence and commercialization research, given its limited funding and the four other deficiencies, as I see them.