I mentioned that some of my colleagues were surprised and upset about the turn of events. Whether that is a continuing concern will, I think, depend on how things evolve. If our government invests significantly in science and technology in the years ahead, we can undoubtedly remain a leader. The science and technology strategy points the way forward in that regard.
There are, I think, negative consequences of eliminating the position. I don't say that simply because I want it; I am not speaking personally. I just believe that philosophically we should have a national science advisor.